First week of classes (for me) is over. I’m taking the following courses:

1. Organic Chemistry II with Lab component
2. Introduction to Biology (aka “Biology 107″)
3. Protein Purification / Synthesis

First off this week was Organic II. My professor, Dr. Dhawale (”dah-WAH-leh”) had a medical procedure done at the end of last semester and is still out recovering. So our interim instructor for this class is Prof. Errol Huffman. I had never had Errol before, but he seems like a really neat guy. He’s a taller, skinny fellow, about my height, mostly balding with thin hair around the sides. He wears thin-rimmed glasses and has the kind of smile that  you can see on his mouth and in his eyes and face. He seems very cordial and has an engaging speech pattern.

Our first day of class he passed out an “eye-opener” quiz, designed to remind us of the material we learned in the first semester. Things like SN1/SN2 reactions, stereochemistry, free-radical halogenation, nomenclature etc.  Most of the people in class I recognized from Organic I, although there were one or two new faces. The girl I sat next to, a 20-something brunette with freckles that reminded me of Punky Brewster, was having trouble recalling some of the material from semester 1. She admitted that she’s a “cram-and-forget” student, angling for a Biology major. We compared notes with the two girls sitting in front of us — some of the questions were a bit ambiguous, which could have been caused by Dr. Dhawale’s English-as-second-language idiosyncrasies, or perhaps because of medication he’s on right now, or perhaps some combination of the two.

I chatted with a few other people in class. There was a guy and a girl I recognized from Organic I that talked with me about the Biotechnology program, a major that I’m considering as my next major after I graduate in the fall.

Thursday’s class was a proper class, although we mostly sat in the darkened room gazing at a Powerpoint slideshow reviewing the last chapter we covered in Organic I. The other half was a cursory introduction to Chapter 8, which deals specifically with Alkenes and Alkene synthesis.  Errol peppered the introduction with some interesting side-trivia bits. We learned Markinokov’s Rule, did some practice equations, and then went over to lab.

Organic II Lab is neat, although somewhat intimidating. I partnered up with a woman from my Organic I class; I think her name is Kim, but I don’t know for sure. I hadn’t taken Organic I lab and so I was still quite the greenhorn with respect to the practical material. We chatted for a bit: Kim told me that she was auditing Organic I to refresh on it for Organic II this semester, which she had also already taken. Apparently she and her daughter had a shitstorm of medical problems all hit at once at the end of the semester for Organic II — she withdrew on the last possible day to focus on her other courses, and then retook Organic this semester. So she was very familiar with what we’d be doing, which was reassuring, because I had no farking clue.

The first thing we did was use the “ITFR”, which I think stands for “Infrared-Beam-Shooting-Through-Chemicals-Reader.” Basically it’s a large grey device, probably about 2′ on each side and 1′ tall, connected to a computer. You prep this little metal widget with some crystals and a chemical you wish to read, slide it into a compartment in the front of the ITFR, and it shoots Infrared light through the chemical and reads the diffraction. We did Diethylamine (C2H5)2-NH, I think). The graph prints out a curve that looks sort of like a tremor sensor: lots of squiggles, a few dramatic dips. The dips are apparently what’s important. We’ll use this later on the semester for qualitative analysis of unknowns.

Back in the lab, we posted the Diethylamine (functional group: Amine) on the corkboard, grabbed some lab materials (test tubes, gloves, pipettes, etc.) and started doing some practice qualitative analyses of known chemicals. The lab manual has this binary-tree, kind of a 20-questions for chemicals: “Are you soluble in water? Are you soluble in Sodium Hydroxide (NaOH)? If I  fuse you with sodium, do you produce Nitrogen or Sulfur as a byproduct?” We use known chemicals for practice so we can practice the procedure and see if we get the expected result. It’s pretty tough — checking solubility on two clear chemicals is difficult because the layer isn’t always distinct. (imagine putting clear vegetable oil and water into a testtube, and then trying to locate the layer) I did learn two things though: (1) It’s only insoluble if it’s layered or forms a precipitate. I incorrectly identified 1-Butanol as insoluble in water because it was cloudy for a moment. Errol pointed out that cloudy simply meant it was hydrating, but slowly. Oops! (2) If the concentration is strong enough, a chemical can solvate anything. So using 3M Hydrochloric Acid when it calls for 5% HCl might not accurately reflect solubility.

On Tuesday and Thursday,  I had Biology. This time Errol was the designated Instructor for the class. The classroom is an average sized classroom, with lab benches around the perimeter and several 3 or 4-seater desks facing the front. Diagrams, posters, and a really neat large-scale DNA model adorn the walls. A body shower and eye-wash station are in the back, for those extremely-rare occasions of fire or chemical splash.

The course content seems really cool. It operates in a rather innovative (and apparently experimental) format:

1. We form into groups (4-5 people each)
2. Discuss the chapter we just read as groups
3. Discuss the chapter as a class (still in our groups)
4. Separate and take a quiz individually
5. Re-group and take the quiz as a group
6. Receive graded quizzes and compare with the key, at which point we are allowed to appeal, in writing, any answers where we differ from the key.
7. Still in groups, do lab work

The appeal process is especially interesting. Errol told me on Thursday that occasionally one of the other Prof’s (Sabine) will intentionally mark an answer on the key incorrectly so that it must be appealed. On Tuesday, I successfully recovered a point by identifying that Proteins are predominantly composed of Carbon, Oxygen, Hydrogen, and Nitrogen where they key identified the fourth element as Sulphur. Go me.

Errol counted us off by threes and we all coalesced into our individual groups. Mine was composed of myself with three other people. Gary, an gentleman in his 40’s, is an EMT/First Responder that is taking classes with hopes of getting into the very competitive nursing program. Another fellow, a tall youth whose name escapes me, is dressed in urban garb. He’s as Biology major, is on the basketball team, and missed most of the season so far due to a knee-injury. He said that a good portion of the school’s team has been injured this season. The third person is a young married woman, around my age, although I’m not entirely sure what her major is.

For our first lab, our group had to pick 2 of 6 or 7 listed body traits (height, arm length, etc.) and experimentally determine if they were related. The idea is to get our feet wet with experimental design, procedure, and data collection / presentation. Our group chose height and foot length. Our hypothesis is: Does being tall grant larger feet?

On Thursday evening, we collected our data. When I get it all tabulated and graphed, I’ll post it up here (in case anyone is interested). To be fair, our sample size was 11 people, so the conclusion won’t be terribly conclusive.

The last class I had was Protein Purification, on Thursday midday. The classroom was the same room as my Organic II lab, but was much less populated. Most of the faces were familiar: people from Organic I and II, and there were 1 or 2 others that I didn’t recognize.

This class seemed very intimidating at first. Errol was acting as Dr. Dhawale’s substitute again, and to kind of review over some fundamentals, he did some transparencies and a crash course in protein composition: what proteins are composed of, how they are chemically formed and structured, what elements comprise individual amino acids, etc. It was simultaneously interesting and frightening. The scary aspect was mostly because I had no idea of the context of the course: Is it all independent study? Will we be guided? How much independent research do we need to do? Errol later told me that Dr. Dhawale will be going over the procedures and examples with us, when he returns.

My prognosis of difficulty for the semester:

Organic II > Organic II lab > Protein Synthesis > Biology

We’ll see if I’m correct…

Categories: Geekery
No Comments »

Sullivan just had his first illness last week. It was pretty horrific — he woke up in the middle of the night crying and then just started vomiting. He vomited on more or less regular intervals for about a day and a half. It was a little scary, but he didn’t have a fever or anything, so we both kind of figured he picked up a stomach bug from the Newark International Airport. (Our Ped. confirmed that it was just a little stomach thing)

So we did the (faux-)Pedialyte thing, but he mostly worked it out on his own after a couple days. Melissa did take him into our Ped’s office out in Dayton, just to make sure there wasn’t a greater problem. This brings me to my next issue:

We’ve been trying to find a local doctor for several months now. We’d like a family practice, someone that I can go in and see with my bizarre “does this look normal?” questions, someone that Sullivan can see for regular Doctor visits, the works. Our current Doctor(s), Seiler and Shah, are wonderful. The only reservations we have is (a) they don’t accept plastic payment, which means we can’t use the pre-tax medical-fund I enrolled in, and (b) they’re about 45 minutes away (just North of Dayton). Melissa applied with a local practice, Dr. Reichley, but was turned down when the Dr. found out we are refusing / delaying vaccinations for Sullivan.

Apparently the vaccinations issue is a deal-breaker for some Doctors. Melissa has done more reading about this than I have, but there’s a legitimate concern here. Most of us (myself included) know vaccinations as “those icky shots we have to get when we’re kids, to keep us from getting nasty contagious illnesses.” This is partly true. Vaccinations do indeed serve a purpose for some illnesses, but not all. Polio, for example, has not had a confirmed case in the U.S. for decades.

The real issue here stems from the method of delivery. Many Doctors do the “cocktail” method. They take a young kid, right around 1-2 years old, and inject them with the “MMR” (Measels, Mumps & Rubella) shot, sometimes throwing in a few others (Polio? Bubonic Plague?) for good measure. And here’s the rub: there have been quite a few documented cases of child development being stunted, skewed, or otherwise interrupted directly after being administered this shot! I know, I know, post hoc ergo propter hoc — just because the complications show up AFTER the shot doesn’t mean it was caused by the shot. But when you start getting enough cases that are similar with similar outcomes, it starts to look convincing.

Jenny McCarthy, whom you will either remember from Playboy, MTV’s Singled Out, or a number of television & movie cameos, has a son from her former marriage with Director John Asher. Her son was developing normally until about 15 months, when he was given his vaccinations - shortly after that he began to develop Autism. She has since taken a very active role in Autism Awareness.

Apparently, this issue is quite controversial. Some people believe there IS a link between MMR Vaccines and Autism, others think that it’s bunk. Honestly, when it comes to my son, I would rather err on the side of the curable-disease. Measels, Mumps, and Rubella all suck, but they’re curable. Autism isn’t. So even if it’s a 1% chance of acquiring it because of the vaccine; it’s not worth it to me.

UPDATE: We found doctors for all of us, and my appointment is in an hour.

Categories: Friends, Family & Pets, Health, Ziggy aka Sullivan
No Comments »