Casting off the shackles

family-budget

  • On February 1st, I got my W-2′s.
  • On February 2nd, I filed our family’s taxes.
  • On February 12th, I got our refund.

On that day, for the first time in 10 years, I became completely liquid-debt free. What a glorious day.

Freeing up the $200-300 / month I was paying (well over the minimum, I was making aggressive payments to pay it off) has allowed us to finally start doing some planning for the future. Continue reading

Napoleon’s Buttons [Book Review]

This is by far the most interesting book I’ve read this year (and is a definite contender for the “all-time” best, as well!)

The premise of the book is “17 molecules that changed history.” From cotton to caffeine, scopolamine to saponin, this book colorfully lays out both the chemical nature of these significant molecules, explaining how they function and WHY they work the way they do; it also illustrates the historical impact, going into great detail about how the course of history was heavily affected by the molecular properties of the topical substance.

The author explained in her introduction that her publisher had initially balked at the idea of using the actual chemical structures in the text — perhaps it was the intimidating look of an organic stick structure that threw them off; But Le Couteur does a terrific job of demystifying these seeming cryptic diagrams, using arrows, circles, and notations to indicate key differences in otherwise similar structures.

In spite of this, Le Couteur’s main focus in the book is not on the technical chemistry, but rather on the historical relevance.

I find that when I’m learning something, the more connections I can form with an idea, the stronger my memory — this book is a powerhouse in that regard; the knowledge of the structural nature of these compounds (at least the relevant functional groups, anyways) coupled with the historical relevance, creates memorable, almost mnemonic, impressions in my mind.

One of my favorite stories from this book was about Isoeugenol (one of the key chemicals in the common spice “Nutmeg”). Centuries ago, before America declared its independence, the English and the Dutch were top world powers. The Dutch’s East India Trading Company dominated the spice islands, Indonesian region, and pursued Captain Jack Sparrow to the edge of the earth. They also controlled Manhattan island (then called “New Amsterdam”).

The British controlled the isle of Run, a tiny island down n Indonesia, near Australia. It was a fairly non-descript island, save for one particular feature: It contained a LOT of nutmeg. At the time, both the Dutch and the British were dealing with the plague, and Isoeugenol, found in nutmeg was believed (somewhat correctly) to help prevent the spread of that disease.

After some fighting, some discussion, and some agreement, the two nations traded the isle of Run for Manhattan island. The plague passed, and everyone moved on. It is quite likely that Holland would have yielded New Amsterdam eventually anyways, since the British presence in the New World was more prevalent, but who knows how things would have turned out that way!

If you enjoy non-fiction, particularly historical or science-oriented, this book is a must read.

Internal Inconsistencies & Suspension of Disbelief, pt. 4

The movie Labyrinth was one of my all-time favorites from childhood. Produced by Jim Henson studios, written for the screen by Terry Jones (of Monty Python fame), and starring David Bowie & Jennifer Connelly (alongside scads of Henson creations), the movie is just plain great. This is part of the reason I introduced Sullivan to it — and he loves it.

In spite of the songs, the whimsy, and the entertainment, my internal nitpicky critic still finds things that challenge the experience.

First of all, if you pay attention, Sarah could have solved the Labyrinth within the first 5 minutes of being in it.

Continue reading

Internal Inconsistencies & Suspension of Disbelief, pt. 3

In the first part, I talked about Curious George, and in part 2, The Neverending Story.

In this part, I’m going to cover one of the most popular movies from the early 90s: The Little Mermaid.

I remember seeing the Little Mermaid in the theaters. It was back when movies were released every few months, and movies stayed in the theaters for a LONG time. (Our theaters back in PA had it for well over 6 months)

I’d like to preface this post by saying that I think the movie is quite good, and that it represents a paradigm shift in Disney’s movie production — the music score, screenplay, and animation were all done phenomenally and were pretty revolutionary for their time. 

But even so… Continue reading

Internal Inconsistencies & Suspension of Disbelief, pt. 2

Last post I covered Curious George, this time I’m going to discuss the 1980s classic: The Neverending Story.

If you were born after 1990 or have been living under a rock, you may not be familiar with this movie, which is currently being re-made AGAIN.

The premise of the movie is simple: the main character, Bastian Balthazar Bux, is a young kid with a dead mom. He reads a lot. He’s awkward and gets picked on. He daydreams and doesn’t study math very well. He also uncovers this book, called “The Neverending Story”, and discovers that the book is aware of him reading it, and his presence is interwoven into the story in a bizarre self-referencing experiment of recursion.

Requisite Disbelief

For the most part, a movie that takes place in Fantasia, a place where every storybook character lives, you are expected to simply accept “hey, it’s totally feasible for a kid to be riding around on a flying dog-dragon.” It’s really not relevant to list them out since it’s in a fantasy world.

But even so, I find some issues that make me cringe and start boring my wife by ranting about it.

First of all, there’s the issue of distance.

Continue reading

Internal Inconsistencies & Suspension of Disbelief, pt. 1

As a parent of a young child, I have the privilege — nay, the duty, to watch children’s movies. Sullivan will lead me into the living room, point to the DVD player (high up on a shelf) and say “wah-brih?” which I’m pretty sure is a near-homophone of “Labyrinth”, one of his favorite movies.

Kids’ movies are often very whimsical and a suspension of disbelief is a necessary requisite.

I tend to get very flustered by catastrophic misuses of science in adult movies, but I’m pretty forgiving when it comes to these wild journeys through fantasy-realms. (Just so we’re on the same page — Sullivan loves Jim Henson movies like Labyrinth, Dark Crystal, Neverending Story, The Muppet (anything), and also some Disney movies. Typical kid stuff.)

I do, however, have a problem with movies that ask you to suspend your disbelief in a certain way, but then are internally inconsistent with their own rules. I’ve been collecting my thoughts on this topic over the past 3 weeks or so, and I believe that many children’s movies could be significantly improved if small changes were made that made them more internally consistent.

In this part, I’m going to discuss Curious George, with other movies to follow on alternating days.

[Fair Warning: there will be some spoilers, so if you are the type of person that would be upset to find out that Snape kills Dumbledore before seeing the new Harry Potter movie you might...um...my bad.] Continue reading