Speculation on “The Last Airbender”

“Avatar: The Last Airbender” (not to be confused with James Cameron’s blue-hippie movie “Avatar”) is a cartoon series that spanned three seasons on Nickelodeon. It’s a witty, fun, and well-developed cartoon done in a quasi-Anime (Japanese animation) style.

M. Night Shylaman, the man behind terrific cinematic feats such as “Unbreakable” and “Signs” (as well as well-intentioned failures such as “The Happening” and “Lady in the Water”) is at the helm for “The Last Airbender,” slated for release on July 2.

I absolutely adore the show, and my 3-year-old son really enjoys it as well (even my wife likes it!). We’re very excited about the theatrical release. Here… watch the trailer, it should give you a rough idea:

(Additional footage can be seen on the previous trailer)

One thing I’ve been wondering, though, is that even though this movie will only encompass the first season (Book 1: Water), how are they cramming 20 episodes (spanning roughly 9 hours) into a 2 hour movie, without feeling rushed like some of the more recent Harry Potter movies?

Here is my speculation on what the movie will cover, based on scenes in that trailer and overall plot importance: Continue reading

Internal Inconsistencies & Suspension of Disbelief, pt. 4

The movie Labyrinth was one of my all-time favorites from childhood. Produced by Jim Henson studios, written for the screen by Terry Jones (of Monty Python fame), and starring David Bowie & Jennifer Connelly (alongside scads of Henson creations), the movie is just plain great. This is part of the reason I introduced Sullivan to it — and he loves it.

In spite of the songs, the whimsy, and the entertainment, my internal nitpicky critic still finds things that challenge the experience.

First of all, if you pay attention, Sarah could have solved the Labyrinth within the first 5 minutes of being in it.

Continue reading

Internal Inconsistencies & Suspension of Disbelief, pt. 2

Last post I covered Curious George, this time I’m going to discuss the 1980s classic: The Neverending Story.

If you were born after 1990 or have been living under a rock, you may not be familiar with this movie, which is currently being re-made AGAIN.

The premise of the movie is simple: the main character, Bastian Balthazar Bux, is a young kid with a dead mom. He reads a lot. He’s awkward and gets picked on. He daydreams and doesn’t study math very well. He also uncovers this book, called “The Neverending Story”, and discovers that the book is aware of him reading it, and his presence is interwoven into the story in a bizarre self-referencing experiment of recursion.

Requisite Disbelief

For the most part, a movie that takes place in Fantasia, a place where every storybook character lives, you are expected to simply accept “hey, it’s totally feasible for a kid to be riding around on a flying dog-dragon.” It’s really not relevant to list them out since it’s in a fantasy world.

But even so, I find some issues that make me cringe and start boring my wife by ranting about it.

First of all, there’s the issue of distance.

Continue reading

French Revolution and Modern America

A while back, Melissa and I watched the movie “Marie Antoinette“, starring Kirsten Dunst as the eponymous role.

I thought the movie was pretty good — Melissa was a bit more critical, but she disapproves of most things. ( :) )

For those of you completely unaware of historical references, the movie was about the brief period of time before the French Revolution began. In a nutshell, the French Revolution occurred because the wealthy ruling class was so far divided (both financially and socially) from the servant / lower class that a Peasant uprising occurred. Other factors believed to be involved as causes were:

  • the exorbitant national debt of france (partly due to Louis XV & XVI’s warmongering / overseas military activities)
  • the “conspicuous consumption of the noble class…despite the financial burden of the populace”
  • “High unemployment and bread prices”
  • The ineptitude of the leader, Louis XVI, to deal with any of these (and many other) problems

[Source] Continue reading

Dark Side of Oz

Dark Side of Oz
We’ve all heard the tale. It’s been spread memetically for years: I’ve seen it referenced on television, heard it buzz around the college campus, read it in publications. If you start Pink Floyd’s “Dark Side of the Moon” album at the third roar of the MGM Lion on Wizard of Oz, you will witness amazing synchronicity.

I decided to put this to the test myself.

Melissa kind of rolled her eyes at me when I told her what I wanted to do. We’re both pretty skeptical about things, but I thought it would be fun to try. Besides, in the worst case scenario, I waste 43 minutes of my life by listening to “Dark Side of the Moon” which is HARDLY a waste by my standards. I found “The Wizard of Oz” at the library yesterday while picking up some movies and returning some books.

My expectations at this point were pretty minimal. Rationally, I know that the band has repeatedly denied intending for any synchronicity. I know that this reeks an awful lot like a “cold read” that alleged psychics use (the kind where most of the magic happens because they expect you to draw the necessary conclusions).

At the same time, I secretly hoped to witness some kind of bizarre and totally unlikely scenario where the two perfectly synched up. I envisioned the album becoming as transparent as an actual soundtrack.

Before you read my own reactions, why don’t you watch it yourself on google video. It’s 43 minutes long and is pre-synched for you so all you need to do is watch.

The Reality

Ok, first off, I have to say that I had forgotten how good “Dark Side of the Moon” is. The experience was definitely worth getting to just kick back and listen to Roger Waters, David Gilmour et al jam out.

Was there any synchronicity? Lyrically, there were a few coincidences. “Balancing on a wave” is sung right as Dorothy is balancing on the pig-pen fence. “Black….and Blue…” is sung just as the Wicked Witch of the West appears in munchkin land. “Lunatic is on the grass” is sung just as the Scarecrow starts dancing on the yellowbrick road. I think I heard something about “magic spell” during the scene with “The Marvel” fortuneteller in the beginning scenes.

Musically, there were a lot more surprising synchronicities. Many of the songs began right at transitional moments. By far, these coincidences were a lot more piquing than the lyrical ones. My rational mind immediately dismissed it as simply being a mere coincidence; A product of artistic timing (perhaps mixed with a little golden ratio proportioning). Nevertheless, it was pretty cool. When Dorothy opens the door to munchkin land (in TECHNICOLOR), the song “Money” begins. Some of the overall tones change at dramatic moments. You have to really see it to see what I mean.

The Verdict

There’s no true synchronicity. You would probably have just as much luck playing any other psychadelic album while watching this movie. Try watching this movie while listening to “Shine on You Crazy Diamonds” or “The Wall”. The psychadelic aspect is important because that genre tends to do a lot more blending of the songs. (You could conceivably do it with an electronic album, I suppose. We used to do that with the Fantasia movies).

Bottom line, it’s a cold-reading phenomena. We WANT to see the coincidences and the connections. It’s our natural tendency towards making the world make sense. With this particular music-movie combo, there were far more moments where the movie and music WEREN’T totally synched up (like during guitar solos, for example, and we all know how long those are!) than there were parts that DID synch. The lyrical coincidences are bogus. You could probably play a 2-Pac or The White Stripes album and find similar coincidences.

The Dark side of Oz is said to be far more significant than it really is, which in my experience is pretty typical of stoners.

Even so, you should check it out and see for yourself. Let me know your thoughts. Like I said before, spending 43 minutes of your time to listen to this Pink Floyd album is never a waste of time. :)

The Lord of the Rings Trilogy [Movie Review]

“There’s good in this world, Mr. Frodo, and it’s worth fightin’ for!”

Overview: [There really isn't any short way to tell the story of this movie accurately...so I apologize in advance]. There’s a uber-powerful ring. Two little-people have to dump it in a volcano hundreds of miles away in the evil lair of the big bad guy. They are aided by their friends, an elf, a dwarf, and a human [sort of], as well as various other people along the way, who unfortunately all get sidetracked by two humungous epic-scale battles waged by the big bad guy. Ultimately good prevails and we all say Hurrah.

Noteworthy Actors / Actresses: Elijah Welch (Frodo), Viggo Mortensen (Aragorn), Sean Astin (Sam), Ian McKellen (Gandalf), John Rhys-Davise (Gimli), Orlando Bloom (Legolas), Hugo Weaving (Elrond), Cate Blanchett (Galadriel), Sean Bean (Boromir), Billy Boyd (Pippin), Ian Holm (Bilbo), Dominic Monaghan (Merry), Liv Tyler (Arwen), Christopher Lee (Sauruman), Brad Dourif (Wormtongue)

Homages / Trivia: Too much to list. Fellowship of the Ring, Two Towers, Return of the King.Verdict: One word: Epic. This trilogy is probably one of the best known book sets of all time. Beautifully shot, directed, and wonderfully acted. I think the only thing that would really bother some people about it is its length (ranging from 2 hrs and change to 3 hrs and change, the THEATRICAL versions… each extended cut adds another 20 to 40 minutes!). But personally, I think if they tried to make it shorter, it would have done it a disservice. Being a geek gives you a special appreciation for it, but I think this movie can appeal to anyone. If you aren’t used to sitting through long movies, watch the theatrical versions, they’re still really good. I wish they would do movies like this with other classics. Definitely worth watching.
Continue reading