<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Blog.amhill &#187; Science bitches!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.amhill.net/tag/science-bitches/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.amhill.net</link>
	<description>Pants optional.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 12:00:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Book Review: Good Germs, Bad Germs</title>
		<link>http://blog.amhill.net/2010/02/16/book-review-good-germs-bad-germs/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.amhill.net/2010/02/16/book-review-good-germs-bad-germs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 20:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Geekery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science, bitches!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Book Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science bitches!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.amhill.net/?p=1224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When people think of &#8220;germs&#8221;, the connotation is generally bad. In fact, when you look up the word germ, the definition of &#8220;microbial organism&#8221; is usually followed up with &#8220;especially a disease-causing microbial organism.&#8221; As a species, we traditionally don&#8217;t think too highly of our microbial co-habitants. Store shelves are covered with products that tout [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.amhill.net/2010/02/16/book-review-good-germs-bad-germs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Contextual Learning</title>
		<link>http://blog.amhill.net/2009/05/29/contextual-learning/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.amhill.net/2009/05/29/contextual-learning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 13:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Academia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Musings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[school]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science bitches!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.amhill.net/?p=846</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of my profs and I occasionally chat about his curriculum. This was his first year teaching at IU East and he&#8217;s still fine-tuning his style. The main roadblock he runs into, and I can totally understand, is that a lot of his students have a very nonchalant, sometimes completely ambivalent, attitude towards the course [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.amhill.net/2009/05/29/contextual-learning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Book Review: Napoleon&#8217;s Buttons</title>
		<link>http://blog.amhill.net/2009/03/22/book-review-napoleons-buttons/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.amhill.net/2009/03/22/book-review-napoleons-buttons/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 12:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science, bitches!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009 Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Book Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science bitches!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.amhill.net/?p=1179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is by far the most interesting book I&#8217;ve read this year (and is a definite contender for the &#8220;all-time&#8221; best, as well!) The premise of the book is &#8220;17 molecules that changed history.&#8221; From cotton to caffeine, scopolamine to saponin, this book colorfully lays out both the chemical nature of these significant molecules, explaining [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.amhill.net/2009/03/22/book-review-napoleons-buttons/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An Open Letter to Andrew Alexander, Ombudsman at the Washington Post</title>
		<link>http://blog.amhill.net/2009/02/27/an-open-letter-to-andrew-alexander-ombudsman-at-the-washington-post/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.amhill.net/2009/02/27/an-open-letter-to-andrew-alexander-ombudsman-at-the-washington-post/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science, bitches!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science bitches!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unabashedly Nerdtastic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.amhill.net/?p=701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Subject: Please start double-checking George Will&#8217;s facts when he talks about science Body I don&#8217;t know if you&#8217;ve been following Carl Zimmer&#8217;s blog, &#8220;The Loom,&#8221; and if you haven&#8217;t, you may want to read today&#8217;s post  &#8211; it covers the outline of the &#8220;saga&#8221;, as Zimmer calls it. The fact checkers FAILED. Citing a blog in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.amhill.net/2009/02/27/an-open-letter-to-andrew-alexander-ombudsman-at-the-washington-post/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Book Review: Physics of the Impossible</title>
		<link>http://blog.amhill.net/2009/02/14/book-review-physics-of-the-impossible/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.amhill.net/2009/02/14/book-review-physics-of-the-impossible/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 12:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science, bitches!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009 Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Book Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michio Kaku]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science bitches!]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.amhill.net/?p=1182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let me preface this by saying that I do like Kaku as a writer &#8212; Hyperspace is still one of my favorite books (I&#8217;ve given it as a gift on 3 separate occasions), and his followup &#8220;Visions&#8221; was equally good. This, though&#8230; I was disappointed. But only because I&#8217;ve read all of his books up [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.amhill.net/2009/02/14/book-review-physics-of-the-impossible/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
